Since we’re exploring the connection between Sunday and Monday (& the rest of the week), I think we need to examine not only how we go about business in the marketplace. How about in the church? In my 30+ years of experience participating in, and sometime presiding over, “council” meetings (gatherings of the elders and deacons), it is clear that our model of preference (or default) is one that is marked by a strong Calvinistic sense of order that features a (usually long) printed agenda. The proceedings are guided by Robert’s Rules of Order (was Robert an apostle?) and honors the principle of majority rule. Meetings are ordinarily begun and closed with brief prayers — bookends around the business of the evening. We trust and pray that the resolutions of the majority represent God’s will for the church.
For many years I have felt a certain restlessness about how we manage the church’s business in our councils. On Sunday we are reminded that we are the body of Christ, that he is the Head, that his Word is our final authority, and the his Spirit leads the church. So how exactly do those foundational truths and characteristics of the church come to expression in the way we do our business? What does it mean for the elders and deacons to be a community of spiritual leaders in the household of faith? Are there ways for us to design and conduct council business that better reflect Paul’s Epistles than Robert’s Rules?
Anyway, these are matters that I have been wrestling with these past couple of weeks. I’ve been helped and stimulated greatly by a couple of books by Charles M. Olsen. Both are published by the Alban Institute. One is Transforming Church Boards into Communities of Spiritual Leaders. The other, co-authored by Danny E. Morris, is Discerning God’s Will Together — A Spiritual Practice for the Church. What Olsen discovered in his research is what I have found to be true throughout my years of ministry — that far too often elders and deacons conclude their terms of service feeling somehow disappointed by the experience. Says Olsen:
“When personal experience stories comes out, they often are couched in ‘something was missing’ language. Having come to the board with an expectation that this would be a faith-deepening and faith-enhancing opportunity, new members found a ‘business-as-usual’ board often bogged down in a time-consuming agenda. What was ‘missing’ for them was a faith orientation” (Transforming, xiii).
By contrast Olsen suggests a new paradigm: “The individual board member is no longer seen as a political representative but as a spiritual leader. The board or council is no longer seen as a group of corporate managers, but as the people of God in community. The meeting is no longer seen as s litany of reports and decisions held together by ‘book-end’ prayers but as ‘worshipful work” (Transforming, xii). “The collective board is not to see itself as a coordinating cabinet or an advisory group…, but as the body of Christ, with members having varying gifts, wisdom, and functions. As such the group’s life is formed by scripture, prayer, silent waiting, witnessing, and serving…” (10).
That’s a paradigm I can get excited about. I’ll come back to this in my next posting and share some of the insights and suggestions offered by Olsen and Morris on how we can move in this new direction (and why it is more old than new!).
kb